Thammasat or Mohasat?

Thammasat University in Bangkok, Thailand, is named using the Thai words ‘thamma’ and ’sat’. Like many words in the Thai language, they derive from their Pali and Sanskrit ancestors. ‘Thamma’, like the Pali ‘dhamma’ and Sanskrit ‘dharma’, roughly translates as ‘truth’, ‘doctrine of truth’, or ‘way of truth’. In Sanskrit, ‘Sat’ refers to ‘existence’ or ‘being’, as in ‘hari om tat sat’ (thou art the inexpressible absolute reality) and ’satchitananda’ (existence-awareness-bliss).

One would think that any educational institution naming itself after such profound, meaningful terms would be committed to seeing that its students are on the path toward achieving these mental and spiritual qualities. Thus, I am shocked to read (and hear) about the way certain officials at Thammasat University are treating AJ Hoge and his students. Although they might have their own reasons for firing AJ, their harrassment of the students, as AJ describes it, is nothing short of immoral.

You should have seen how happy our students here in Kyoto were to have been getting to know their Thai counterparts in AJ’s classroom. They read their blogs, exchanged messages, and even recorded video greetings. They were just starting to get warmed up to one another and were going to carry out collaborative webpublishing projects, possibly in the form of podcasts. For Thammasat to use scare tactics, to make threats, and to interrogate students is wrong. And to prevent students from continuing to interact with mine and to discourage them from exercising their right to free speech is a sick abuse of power.

Having spent close to a year of my life in Thailand, I can say with passion that I love its culture and its people. I have also benefitted greatly on a personal level from the teachings of Thai people on the subjects of Vipassana, Buddhism, and Traditional Thai Massage. I thought that Thammasat was really cool place, too, especially for hiring a dynamic educator like AJ who cares deeply about his students and their learning. To read about the way certain people at Thammasat are treating AJ and his students makes me wonder whether the university is has lost its ’sati’ (awareness, mindfulness) and has allowed ‘moha’ (delusion, ignorance) to infiltrate its collective consciousness.

I’m left confused and disappointed about these events as I understand them. I feel sorry for the Thai students as well. Please, would someone at the BAS tell me I’m wrong? Assure me that your students are indeed encouraged to use the English language they are learning to communicate openly with foreign people, to share their ideas cross-culturally, and to engage in meaningful conversation with others using internet technology?

Trackbacks & Pings

  1. EFL Geek: ESL & EFL in Korea on 25 Oct 2005 at 4:09 pm

    Read these blog entries

    Aaron Campbell, Marco Polo, and JH (whom I found via Marco and am adding to my blogroll) have all written very interesting and thoughtful peices that any teacher should read.

Comments

  1. Marco Polo wrote:

    Sad, yes, but I’d like to get the university’s side of the story before making my judgement. At the moment, we only have one side and of course it’s hard not to feel sympathetic: “those brave individuals, fighting for truth and freedom and creativity, up against those nasty bureacratic, unimaginative, stifling, anti-life Imperial forces…” Like, I said, all a bit Star War-ish for my taste.

  2. Bee wrote:

    Although my class was heavily involved in the P2P blog exchange with AJ´s student and we were also quite shocked at waht happened, I agree with Marco Polo that we only have here one side of the story.

    It might be interesting to find out what the students think of it through their personal blogs. Are they allowed to keep them and continue the exchange or will they be censored and expelled if what they say does not fit in?

  3. Aaron wrote:

    Yes…we only have one side of the story. But do you ever expect to hear the other side? If something injust is taking place, the perpetrators rarely speak up, they act strongly and go on with business as usual.

    I think about what James Farmer went through a while back when he was given a cease and desist notice from his university. He received a lot of support from the edu-blogging community, yet I don’t remember anybody waiting around to hear from the university on the issue before they voiced their support. Granted, James had already established solid online presence and trust through all of his valuable contributions, but having met AJ and spent some quality time with him, I trust him and feel that he had been unfairly taken advantage of. I would do the same for anyone I trusted, including all of you who have left comments here.

    And I *could* be wrong - I am aware of that. But unless we speak up when we see evidence of injustice, then injustice will continue to happen. If we constantly wait for the other side to put forth an explanation, we’ll be taken advantage of constantly by those wishing to silence us.

  4. nongnoi wrote:

    I am at another Thai government university and know teachers and students at Thammasat. As some people said, AJ has only presented one side of the story.

    One problem was that he was teaching and grading without regard to any curriculum, or standards set by the university. However much you might disagree with some things at a Thai university (or any university), using the students to be what he boasted as “subversive” just isn’t right.

    What really got people worried, though is his other blog that the students had access to: http://hobopoet.blogspot.com Here, he goes on and on about the virtues of not working for a living, how to beat “the system”, but worst of all, about drugs. He also includes instructions for the manufacture of drugs. In a country with the death penalty for drug offenses, and teaching rather impressionable 18-22 year olds, I don’t have much sympathy for him anymore.

    Unfortunately, the students got caught in the middle.

  5. Cleve wrote:

    Agree with nongnoi. I’ve only heard AJ’s side of the story, but that’s enough…I don’t have any sympathy for him. Everyone who read his blog knew he would be fired, and so did he. Why would you need to hear the other side?

    I think AJ’s brilliant and passionate and creative, and I link to him all the time on my blog. He’s going to be a fantastic freelance teacher. I even have a project I’d like to collaborate with him on once I figure out how. Sometimes when I read his “informal action research introspection” posts I literally jump out of my chair and pump my fist. But I think he wastes a lot of his potential by over-investing in his “rebel” self-identity, and unfortunately his students suffered this time.

    I had read through his other blog but was amused rather than worried though since I have a pretty laissez-faire attitude about all that. Unfortunately, I hadn’t thought about the cultural implications that nongnoi points out.

    But more importantly, when will people figure out that to be truly subversive you can’t go around and scream “HEY EVERYBODY! I’M SUBVERSIVE!”? The true subversives are under the radar, quietly working towards getting things changed and getting things done.

  6. panteap wrote:

    hello sir, I’m a M.A. sudents in EFL course.I’am doning a research on using weblogs for teaching writing assignment to english university students in iran.I wonder if you can help me or even introduce some refrences inorder to do writing assessment in weblogs.tnx

  7. sanook wrote:

    On his websites AJ is constantly talking about himself and promoting a “follow your bliss” attitude to life. It’s a shrill sound and very self-focussed. It comes over as obnoxious to some people and I guess thats how it turned out to Thammassat uni staff. There are loads of great teachers out there who do great, extraordinary things with their students and are not so much into self-promotion. Anyway AJ, hope your freelance work works out.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*